Skip to main content

Diagnostics and Action Center

GEO diagnostics​

Agentic Readiness evaluates whether a target is understandable, attributable and citable by AI systems. It covers technical discoverability, canonical identity, structured data, content clarity, evidence quality, entity consistency, machine-readable artifacts and answer readiness.

It does not score cart, checkout, payment, Masterpass or Mastercard readiness. Commerce endpoints discovered during crawling may remain in raw technical evidence, but they must not influence GEO scoring or recommendations.

Diagnostic lifecycle​

  1. Select target, scope and provider.
  2. Discover reachable pages and machine-readable assets.
  3. Evaluate technical, content, entity, evidence and citation signals.
  4. Store an immutable report with score breakdown and evidence.
  5. Convert actionable gaps into findings and recommendations.

History preserves old reports; improvements to the engine do not rewrite previous snapshots.

Diagnostic score composition​

AreaRepresentative questionsExcluded concepts
DiscoverabilityCan approved crawlers reach and identify the relevant assets?Cart/checkout availability
Entity clarityIs the target canonical, unambiguous and related correctly?Payment provider support
CitabilityAre claims specific, sourced, current and answer-ready?Transaction completion
Machine readabilityAre appropriate metadata, structured data and artifacts valid?Commerce protocol readiness
Evidence qualityCan important statements be traced to authoritative sources?Masterpass/Mastercard presence
Answer readinessCan an AI system describe the target accurately for relevant prompts?“Can the AI buy here?” scoring

Recommendation roadmap​

Recommendations include rationale, proposed change, impact, confidence, effort, priority score, expected lift, owner, due date, dependencies and verification plan. Prioritization must remain explainable.

Governed actions​

Actions carry risk class, scope, idempotency key, proposed diff, policy result, execution result, verification result and rollback plan. Row actions are managed through modal workflows; opening a separate edit page is not required for routine table operations.

Controlled autopilot​

Autonomy begins at suggest. Higher automation levels may prepare approval-bound steps, but the planner returns executable=false unless all external execution requirements are satisfied. Budget, dependency order, approval checkpoints, safe stop and emergency stop remain mandatory.

Action responsibility matrix​

StepSystem responsibilityHuman/policy responsibility
FindingPreserve evidence and explain the gapConfirm relevance and business context
RecommendationEstimate impact, confidence and effortAccept, dismiss or refine
Proposed actionProduce diff, dependencies and verification planAssign owner and risk class
ApprovalEnforce required state and record actorReview scope, claims, destination and rollback
ExecutionApply idempotently and record external referenceIntervene on unsafe/unknown state
VerificationCheck expected destination and later measurementAccept outcome or request rollback